Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background and objective
Missing data and unmeasured confounding are key challenges for external comparator studies. This work evaluates bias and other performance characteristics depending on missingness and unmeasured confounding by means of two case studies and simulations.Methods
Two case studies were constructed by taking the treatment arms from two randomised controlled trials and an external real-world data source that exhibited substantial missingness. The indications of the randomised controlled trials were multiple myeloma and metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Overall survival was taken as the main endpoint. The effects of missing data and unmeasured confounding were assessed for the case studies by reporting estimated external comparator versus random
SUBMITTER: Rippin G
PROVIDER: S-EPMC11554740 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature