Grounding the Selectionist Explanation for the Success of Science in the External Physical World.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: I identify two versions of the scientific anti-realist's selectionist explanation for the success of science: Bas van Fraassen's original and K. Brad Wray's newer interpretation. In Wray's version, psycho-social factors internal to the scientific community - viz. scientists' interests, goals, and preferences - explain the theory-selection practices that explain theory-success. I argue that, if Wray's version were correct, then science should resemble art. In art, the artwork-selection practices that explain artwork-success appear faddish. They are prone to radical change over time. Theory-selection practices that explain theory-success in science are however not faddish. They are mostly stable; that is, long-lived and consistent over time. This is because scientists (explicitly or implicit
SUBMITTER: van der Merwe R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC11568972 | biostudies-literature | 2024
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA