Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To estimate the effectiveness and costs of Rehabilitation for Life (RFL) compared with usual rehabilitation and care after hip fracture to determine which course offered the most value for money.Design
Cost-utility analysis.Patient
Community-dwelling patients aged 65+ after hip fracture.Method
123 intervention and 122 control patients were included. Data was collected at 5 points from discharge to 1-year follow-up. Cost analysis included expenses to hospital, general practice, specialist services, medications, rehabilitation, home and informal care, transport, and waiting times. The primary outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).Results
The intervention group experienced a statistically significant mean QALY
SUBMITTER: Ipsen JA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC11600605 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature