Mathematical programming tools for randomization purposes in small two-arm clinical trials: A case study with real data.

ABSTRACT: Modern randomization methods in clinical trials are invariably adaptive, meaning that the assignment of the next subject to a treatment group uses the accumulated information in the trial. Some of the recent adaptive randomization methods use mathematical programming to construct attractive clinical trials that balance the group features, such as their sizes and covariate distributions of their subjects. We review some of these methods and compare their performance with common covariate-adaptive randomization methods for small clinical trials. We introduce an energy distance measure that compares the discrepancy between the two groups using the joint distribution of the subjects' covariates. This metric is more appealing than evaluating the discrepancy between the groups using their margin

SUBMITTER: Vazquez AR 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11602943 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Nov-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature