Effects of Automated Versus Conventional Ventilation on Quality of Oxygenation-A Substudy of a Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT: Background/Objectives: Attaining adequate oxygenation in critically ill patients undergoing invasive ventilation necessitates intense monitoring through pulse oximetry (SpO₂) and frequent manual adjustments of ventilator settings like the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) and the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Our aim was to compare the quality of oxygenation with the use of automated ventilation provided by INTELLiVENT-Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) vs. ventilation that is not automated, i.e., conventional pressure-controlled or pressure support ventilation. Methods: A substudy within a randomized crossover clinical trial in critically ill patients under invasive ventilation. The primary endpoint was the percentage of breaths in

SUBMITTER: Botta M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11721315 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature