Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
The role of pulsatile versus non-pulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is still in debate. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively assess the impact of pulsatile versus non-pulsatile flow on patients' recovery.Methods
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials comparing pulsatile and non-pulsatile flow in cardiac surgeries with CPB. Data were analyzed using the random-effects model. Then, sensitive analysis and meta-regression were conducted.Findings
32 studies including 2568 patients were considered in this meta-analysis. There is no difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (risk ratio [RR] = 0.74, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.35-1.56, p = 0.43). The ICU stay fo
SUBMITTER: Yan W
PROVIDER: S-EPMC11758213 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature