Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
The rapid proliferation of health apps has not been matched by a comparable growth in scientific evaluations of their effectiveness, particularly for apps available to the public. This gap has prompted ongoing debate about the types of evidence necessary to validate health apps, especially as the perceived risk level varies from wellness tools to diagnostic aids. The perspectives of the general public, who are direct stakeholders, are notably underrepresented in discussions on digital health evidence generation.Objective
This study aimed to explore public understanding and expectations regarding the evidence required to demonstrate health apps' effectiveness, including at varying levels of health risk.Methods
A total of 4 focus group discussions were held
SUBMITTER: Bondaronek P
PROVIDER: S-EPMC11769687 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature