Comparing spirometry, impulse oscillometry with computed tomography for assessing small airway dysfunction in subjects with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Studies on consistency among spirometry, impulse oscillometry (IOS), and histology for detecting small airway dysfunction (SAD) remain scarce. Considering invasiveness of lung histopathology, we aimed to compare spirometry and IOS with chest computed tomography (CT) for SAD detection, and evaluate clinical characteristics of subjects with SAD assessed by these three techniques.

Methods

We collected baseline data from the Early COPD (ECOPD) study. CT-defined SAD was defined as parametric response mapping quantifying SAD (PRM^fSAD) ≥ 15%. Spirometry-defined SAD was defined as at least two of maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF), forced expiratory flow 50% (FEF50), and forced expiratory flow 75% (FEF75) less than 65% of predicted. IOS-defined SAD was defined

SUBMITTER: Huang S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11773755 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature