Expert Clinical Interpretation of Continuous Glucose Monitor Reports From Individuals Without Diabetes.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Clinical interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data for people without diabetes has not been well established. This study aimed to investigate concordance among CGM experts in recommending clinical follow-up for individuals without diabetes, based upon their independent review of CGM data.

Methods

We sent a survey out to expert clinicians (n = 18) and asked them to evaluate 20 potentially challenging Dexcom G6 Pro CGM reports (and hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] and fasting venous blood glucose levels) from individuals without diabetes. Clinicians reported whether they would recommend follow-up and the reasoning for their decision. We performed Fleiss Kappa interrater reliability to determine agreement among clinicians.

Results

More than half

SUBMITTER: Spartano NL 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11822776 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature