Cavernous tissue preservation technique versus conventional technique during penile prosthesis implantation: a prospective comparative study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Few prospective studies in literature with long postoperative follow-up compared between cavernous tissue sparing and conventional penile prosthesis implantation techniques.

Aim

To compare between cavernous tissue sparing and conventional penile prosthesis implantation techniques in terms of patient and partner satisfaction and perioperative outcomes.

Methods

In All, 60 Patients with severe erectile dysfunction were randomized into 2 equal groups; patients undergoing conventional malleable penile prosthesis implantation, and patients undergoing the cavernous tissue-sparing technique. Postoperatively, prosthesis function and patient satisfaction were assessed at 6 weeks after surgery and then 3-6 and 12 months using EDITS and QoLSPP questionnaires. Patients

SUBMITTER: Alhefnawy MA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11850506 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature