The reporting quality and methodological quality of dynamic prediction models for cancer prognosis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

To evaluate the reporting quality and methodological quality of dynamic prediction model (DPM) studies on cancer prognosis.

Methods

Extensive search for DPM studies on cancer prognosis was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases. The Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) and the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) were used to assess reporting quality and methodological quality, respectively.

Results

A total of 34 DPM studies were identified since the first publication in 2005, the main modeling methods for DPMs included the landmark model and the joint model. Regarding the reporting quality, the median overall TRIPOD adherence score was 75%. The

SUBMITTER: Yan P 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11872325 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature