Rapid reviews methods series: assessing the appropriateness of conducting a rapid review.

ABSTRACT: This paper, part of the Cochrane Rapid Review Methods Group series, offers guidance on determining when to conduct a rapid review (RR) instead of a full systematic review (SR). While both review types aim to comprehensively synthesise evidence, RRs, conducted within a shorter time frame of typically 6 months or less, involve streamlined methods to expedite the process. The decision to opt for an RR depends on the urgency of the research question, resource availability and the impact on decision outcomes. The paper categorises scenarios where RRs are appropriate, including urgent decision-making, informing guidelines, assessing new technologies and identifying evidence gaps. It also outlines instances when RRs may be inappropriate, cautioning against conducting them solely for ease, quick p

SUBMITTER: Garritty C 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11874353 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature