Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Importance
Active monitoring (AM) for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has been considered as a potential alternative to guideline-concordant care (GCC; inclusive of surgery with or without radiation). Reported data comparing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between GCC and AM for DCIS are lacking.Objective
To compare PROs at baseline and over time in patients with low-risk DCIS randomized to receive either AM or GCC.Design, setting, and participants
This prespecified secondary outcome analysis used prospectively collected validated questionnaires at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years from participants enrolled from June 2017 to January 2023 in the Comparing an Operation to Monitoring, With or Without Endocrine Therapy (COMET) study for low-risk DCIS, w
SUBMITTER: Partridge AH
PROVIDER: S-EPMC11908405 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature