Inter-rater reliability of global and analytic assessment of prosthodontic procedures.

ABSTRACT:

Background

There have been few comparisons of global and analytic evaluations of fixed prosthodontic procedures. Given the growing number of dental students and the time-consuming nature of assessment, there is a need for a simple but reliable method of evaluation. This study therefore evaluated and compared inter-rater reliability of assessment of preclinical prosthodontic procedures using global and analytic methods and the impact of academic rank on evaluation outcomes.

Methods

Two professors and three assistant professors evaluated five different prosthodontic procedures performed by dental students using two evaluation methods (analytic evaluation using a rubric and global "glare and grade"). Inter-examiner reliability was assessed using interclass correlation coefficie

SUBMITTER: Baik KM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC12359939 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature