Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair has gained popularity for its enhanced precision and visualization. Two main approaches-r-IPOM and r-TAPP-differ in technique and risk profiles. r-IPOM/+ is technically simpler and preferred for larger defects, but may increase seroma and bowel-related complications. Conversely, r-TAPP employs extraperitoneal mesh positioning, potentially reducing postoperative complications. This meta-analysis aimed to compare perioperative outcomes between r-IPOM and r-TAPP, focusing on seroma, surgical site infection (SSI), and hernia defect closure. Secondary outcomes included recurrence, reoperation, operative time, and hospital stay.Methods
A systematic meta-analysis, including 11 studies and 1001 patients, was performed. Pooled event
SUBMITTER: Abdelsamad A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC12364986 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature