Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
This meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic value of writhing and fidgety general movements (GMs) for predicting cerebral palsy.Methods
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science for cohort or case-control studies evaluating GMs. We calculated the superiority index (S), sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) using STATA.Results
Eight studies were included. For writhing movements, S = 1, sensitivity = 0.99, specificity = 0.69, AUC = 0.91, and DOR = 166. For fidgety movements, S = 3, sensitivity = 0.95, specificity = 0.87, AUC = 0.97, and DOR = 144. Subgroup analyses by study design, risk population, and sample size consistently showed better predictive performanc
SUBMITTER: Wang T
PROVIDER: S-EPMC12366895 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature