Dataset Information

Aerobic Versus Resistance Exercise for Overweight: Is there a Difference in Reporting Quality?

ABSTRACT:

SUBMITTER: Rohwer J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC12372422 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Interventions: This study was a 16-week exercise intervention programme done prior to surgery with assessments undertaken at three time-points: (1) baseline, (2) immediately pre-surgery and (3) 8-week post-surgery follow-up. This is a 16 weeks exercise programme that commenced prior to the schedule surgery. Patients undertook an exercise programme that consisted of two supervised clinic sessions per week. Each supervised exercise session took approximately 60 minutes to complete. Sessions commenced with a 5-minute warm-up consisting of moderate level of aerobic exercise (~60% heart rate maximum (HRmax)), as well as stretching exercises of the major muscle groups: chest, shoulder, biceps, triceps, quadriceps, hamstrings and calf muscles. This was followed by a resistance-training regime that included a series of six exercises targeting the major muscles of the upper- and lower-body. Upper-limb exercises included chest press, seated row and lat pull-down. Lower-limb exercises were leg extension, leg curl and leg press. All exercises were performed through the full range of motion adhering to correct techniques. To ensure the progressive nature of the training programme, patients were encouraged to work past the repetition maximum (RM) prescribed, with resistance increased by 5 – 10% for the subsequent set/training sessions if they were able to exceed the number specified. Progression of resistance followed guidelines previously outlined by Galvao and Newton (2005). The training phases were as follows: week 1 – 2 (two sets 12 RM), week 3 – 5 (three sets of 10 RM), week 6 – 8 (three sets of 8 RM), and week 9 – 10 (four sets of 6 RM). After week 10, the training phases set in week 1 – 2 were resumed to implement a periodised exercise model. A further 20 minutes of aerobic exercise was unde Primary outcome(s): The primary objective of this feasibility study was to determine the efficacy of a supervised, pre-surgical exercise programme consisting of targeted resistance and aerobic training for rectal cancer patients scheduled to received rectal resection surgery. Specifically, we aimed to investigate the effects of a pre-surgical exercise intervention on neuromuscular strength using the one-repetition maximum chest press, leg press, seated row and leg extension exercise protocol[Baseline, pre-surgery and 8-weeks post-surgery] Study Design: Purpose: Prevention; Allocation: Non-randomised trial

Dataset Information

Aerobic Versus Resistance Exercise for Overweight: Is there a Difference in Reporting Quality?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets