Mapping variation in dual use risk assessments of synthetic biology projects.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

When a life science project is identified as potential dual use research of concern (DURC), United States government policy and biorisk management professionals recommend conducting a risk assessment of the project and using its results to choose strategies to manage any associated risks. However, there is little empirical research on how real-world projects score on DURC assessments, the extent to which reviewers agree or disagree about risks for a given project, or how risk judgments map to recommended risk management strategies. By studying the process of DURC risk assessment, it may be possible to develop methods that are more consistent, accurate, and cost-effective.

Methods

Using a modified version of the framework in the Companion Guide to the United Stat

SUBMITTER: Greene D 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC12392780 | biostudies-literature | 2025

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature