Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
This systematic review and meta-analysis compared single- versus double-layer uterine closure at the time of cesarean delivery.Data sources
MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception until May 2024.Study eligibility criteria
We included only randomized controlled trials (RTSs) that compared single-layer versus double-layer uterine closure at the time of cesarean delivery.Study appraisal and synthesis methods
Outcomes were analyzed using a random-effects model. Results are expressed as risk differences. The assessment of the risk of bias was performed by using the Risk of Bias 2 tool. The primary outcome was the incidence of scar defects (i.e., niche) at 6 months after
SUBMITTER: Dominoni M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC12414086 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature