Unknown

Dataset Information

0

The concept, intention, and evaluation of the term treatment-refractory meningioma.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Treatment-refractory meningioma is a widely used term but lacks standardized criteria, impairing research comparability and treatment evaluation. The aim of this study was to assess the heterogeneity of patient populations labeled as treatment-refractory and to explore recommendations for better consistency.

Methods

We systematically reviewed 69 studies published before 2024 and analyzed individual participant data from 15 cohorts (n = 211) that included treatment-refractory patients who underwent experimental therapy with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted therapies. A reference cohort (n = 102) with newly diagnosed WHO-3 meningiomas was used descriptively for comparison. Progression and death were the primary endpoints. Hazard rate ratios were estimated via Poisson regression, and inter-study heterogeneity was quantified using I² statistics.

Results

Definitions of treatment-refractory varied substantially across previous studies. WHO-1 patients showed high statistical inter-study variability, particularly for the long-acting SSTR-analogues group when assessing progression (I² = 81.7%) and death (I² =74.8%). Patients with treatment-refractory WHO-2 and WHO-3 meningioma exhibited more consistency across endpoints and SSTR-targeted therapies (I² percentages ≤ 16.0%). Risk of progression and death differed significantly by WHO grade, regardless of SSTR-targeted therapy.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate an inconsistent use of the term treatment-refractory and substantial variability of effect estimates dependeing on the individual cohorts. Pooling patients across WHO grades is unfeasible for assessing treatment effects. Based on the present study and prior evidence, we outline recommendations to improve consistency in future trial design and enable more meaningful comparisons across studies. The recommendations are grouped into four categories: radiographic evaluation, endpoints, clinical core elements, and molecular classification.

SUBMITTER: Jensen LR 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC12420741 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

The concept, intention, and evaluation of the term treatment-refractory meningioma.

Jensen Lasse Rehné LR   Maier Andrea Daniela AD   Juratli Tareq A TA   Goutagny Stéphane S   Bertero Luca L   Graillon Thomas T   Brokinkel Benjamin B   Gupta Tejpal T   Torp Sverre Helge SH   Rudà Roberta R   Clement Paul M PM   van Essen Martijn M   Tabernero María Dolores MD   Gousias Konstantinos K   Rodríguez Álvaro Otero ÁO   Chang Jong Hee JH   Suh Chang-Ok CO   Cardona Andrés Felipe AF   Arrieta Oscar O   Ruiz-Patiño Alejandro A   Bota Daniela A DA   Hrachova Maya M   Scheie David D   Kristensen Bjarne Winther BW   Munch Tina Nørgaard TN   Law Ian I   Fugleholm Kåre K   Meling Torstein Ragnar TR   Furtner Julia J   Preusser Matthias M   Walter Martin Alexander MA   Mathiesen Tiit T   Mirian Christian C  

Journal of neuro-oncology 20250804 2


<h4>Background</h4>Treatment-refractory meningioma is a widely used term but lacks standardized criteria, impairing research comparability and treatment evaluation. The aim of this study was to assess the heterogeneity of patient populations labeled as treatment-refractory and to explore recommendations for better consistency.<h4>Methods</h4>We systematically reviewed 69 studies published before 2024 and analyzed individual participant data from 15 cohorts (n = 211) that included treatment-refra  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3789398 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10629337 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9988284 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9989003 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3756467 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6147484 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4339127 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3337301 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9858265 | biostudies-literature