Ventilation strategies in cardiogenic shock: insights from the FRENSHOCK observational registry.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Despite scarce data, invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) is widely suggested as first-line ventilatory support in cardiogenic shock (CS) patients. We assessed the real-life use of different ventilation strategies in CS and their influence on short and mid-term prognosis.

Methods

FRENSHOCK was a prospective registry including 772 CS patients from 49 centers in France. Patients were categorized into three groups according to the ventilatory supports during hospitalization: no mechanical ventilation group (NV), non-invasive ventilation alone group (NIV), and invasive mechanical ventilation group (MV). We compared clinical characteristics, management, and occurrence of death and major adverse event (MAE) (death, heart transplantation or ventricular assist device) at

SUBMITTER: Volle K 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC12460561 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature