Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Women display marked variability in ovarian reserve, which is pivotal for fertility and menopausal timing. Traditional criteria, such as Bologna and Poseidon, classify women into broad groups but do not provide individualized predictions for ovarian aging or reproductive milestones. This study aims to refine the AA model (AMH + age) to enhance clinical usability, robustness, and interpretability.Materials and methods
Single-center retrospective ART cohort (GnRH-antagonist cycles, 2017-2021). Training: 15,241 cycles (2017-2019); Testing: 14,498 cycles (2020-2021). Poor ovarian response (POR) was defined as <5 oocytes. Three logistic-regression specifications were compared: categorical (Model-0), continuous (Model-1), and polynomial (age quadratic, AMH cubic; Model
SUBMITTER: Xu H
PROVIDER: S-EPMC12463964 | biostudies-literature | 2025
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature