Project description:Trainees may be implicated in malpractice lawsuits. Our study examines malpractice cases involving plastic surgery trainees.MethodsUsing the LexisNexis database, verdicts and settlements from appellate state and federal cases between February 1988 and 2020 were queried. A nonrepresentative sample of 300 cases was compiled.ResultsDuring a 32-year period, 21 lawsuits involving plastic surgery trainees were identified. Of these, 14 (66.67%) involved claims when a trainee was directly named as a defendant. Eighteen (85.7%) cases were due to procedural-related adverse outcomes, while three (14.3%) cases were associated with clinical or diagnostic-related adverse outcomes. Of the procedure-related cases, five (27.8%) occurred when the trainee was the lead surgeon. Allegations included lack of informed consent of procedure complications (11, 52.4%), procedural error (11, 52.4%), failure to supervise trainee (11, 52.4%), inexperience of trainee (eight, 38.1%), incorrect diagnosis or treatment (five, 23.8%), delay in evaluation (three, 14.3%), lack of awareness of resident involvement (three, 14.3%), lack of follow-up (three, 14.3%), and prolonged operative time (one, 4.8%). Median time from injury to lawsuit resolution was 3.8 years [interquartile range (IQR), 3-5 years]. Verdicts were ruled in favor of the defense in eight (38.1%) cases and for plaintiff in six (28.6%) cases. A settlement was made in seven (33.3%) cases. Median payout for plaintiff-won cases was $5,100,000 (IQR, $1,530,000-$17,500,000); the median settlement was $2,500,000 (IQR, $262,500-$4,410,000).ConclusionsProcedural error, improper informed consent, improper trainee supervision, and resident inexperience were the most common allegations. These factors can lead to financial and psychological burdens early in a physician's career.
| S-EPMC9839246 | biostudies-literature