High prevalence of articles with image-related problems in animal studies of subarachnoid hemorrhage and low rates of correction by publishers.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Scientific progress relies on science's capacity for self-correction. If erroneous articles remain unchallenged in the publication record, they can mislead future research and undermine evidence-based decision-making. All articles included in a systematic review of animal studies on early brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage were analyzed for image-related issues. We included 608 articles, of which 243 articles were identified as problematic (40.0%). Of the 243 problematic articles, 55 (22.6%) have been corrected, 7 (2.9%) have received an expression of concern, 5 (2.1%) were marked with the Taylor & Francis under investigation pop-up, and 19 (7.8%) were retracted. In 9 of the 55 corrected articles (16.4%), new problems were found after correction or not all issues were resolved in t
SUBMITTER: Aquarius R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC12574824 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA