Sex/gender entanglement: A problem of knots and buckets.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: When used as variables in biomedical research, sex and gender can be difficult to operationalize and measure. Questions have arisen about whether either category is stable or causally meaningful in a research context. Here, we discuss some of the limitations of using both or even one of these categories in correlational or experimental work. We argue that attempting to draw a distinction between sex and gender can reignite the nature/nurture debate, inadvertently bringing outdated metaphors and assumptions about innateness and causation into our research. Many researchers, including ourselves, have described sex and gender as separate collections of causal factors (which we describe as a "bucket" metaphor) or as entangled (a "knot" metaphor). Because they regard sex and gender as conceptua
SUBMITTER: Maney DL
PROVIDER: S-EPMC12577278 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA