Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesises evidence from both randomised trials and observational studies to determine whether lobectomy or sublobar resection offers improved outcomes for patients with stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods
Studies (up to June 2025) comparing lobectomy and sublobar resection (segmentectomy or wedge) for clinical stage Ia NSCLC (<2 cm) were included in the random-effects meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using Risk of Bias 2 for randomised trials or Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions-I for observational studies.Results
19 studies, including four randomised trials, were included. Overall survival at 5 years was comparable between lobectomy and sublobar resection (HR=1.00; 9
SUBMITTER: Dixon LK
PROVIDER: S-EPMC12581064 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature