Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression for single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Currently, both unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression (UBED) and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression (PELD) recognized as effective treatments for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). Nevertheless, there remains a divergence of opinion regarding the preferable operative procedure. Consequently, the meta-analysis aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and adverse events associated with UBED and PELD in the treatment of DLSS.

Methods

Multiple databases were thoroughly screened on the internet to identify studies focusing on clinical endpoints and complications of UBED versus PELD in the management of single-level DLSS. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were recorded to assess clinical outcomes. Add

SUBMITTER: Zhang Y 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC12584529 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature