Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical education is evolving, offering new tools to enhance teaching and assessment. Among these, script concordance tests (SCTs) are well-suited to evaluate clinical reasoning in contexts of uncertainty. Traditionally, SCTs require expert panels for scoring and feedback, which can be resource-intensive. Recent advances in generative AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), suggest the possibility of replacing human experts with simulated ones, though this potential remains underexplored.Objective
This study aimed to evaluate whether LLMs can effectively simulate expert judgment in SCTs by using generative AI to author, score, and provide feedback for SCTs in cardiology and pneumology. A secondary objectiv
SUBMITTER: Hudon A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC12634011 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature