Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Inguinal hernia repair significantly affects patient quality of life and healthcare costs. The systematic assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) emphasizes the importance of valid and responsive measurement tools.Objective
To externally validate the Core Outcome Measure Index for hernia surgery (COMI-Hernia) and determine its Minimal Important Difference (MID) using an anchor-based approach.Methods
Data from 240 patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair between 2018 and 2020 were analyzed (Asklepios Klinik Langen, Germany). The patients completed the COMI-Hernia questionnaire preoperatively and at multiple postoperative intervals (up to 24 months). Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness were assessed, and MID values were calculate
SUBMITTER: Nazemi F
PROVIDER: S-EPMC12727379 | biostudies-literature | 2025 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature