Comparison of preprints and their corresponding peer-reviewed publications in the health field: a scoping review.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Preprints are becoming more common in the health sciences and allow for instant dissemination of research findings; however, with the risk of compromising quality and transparency. Peer review potentially improves reporting and reduces errors, although its actual impact is not known. The objective of this scoping review was to synthesize evidence comparing preprints in the health areas to their peer-reviewed versions and assess preprint publication rates.

Methods

We searched Embase, Medline OVID, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to July 2024 for studies comparing preprints with their peer-reviewed versions and/or investigating preprint publication rates. Two reviewers independently conducted screening and extracted data on study characteristics, parameter

SUBMITTER: Zoghbi MS 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC12829155 | biostudies-literature | 2026 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature