Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
The optimal ventilation strategy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains undetermined. Synchronizing ventilation to chest compressions has been proposed to enhance end-organ perfusion and oxygenation. This study evaluates the pulmonary function and injury in a synchronized ventilation (SV) strategy using lower peak pressure compared to chest compression synchronized ventilation (CCSV) with higher peak pressures and intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV).Materials/methods
35 pigs underwent cardiac arrest, followed by basic and advanced life support with mechanical chest compressions and ventilation according to randomized groups: IPPV (peak pressure (P peak) 40 mbar), SV (P peak 20 mbar), and CCSV (P
SUBMITTER: Renz M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC12907900 | biostudies-literature | 2026 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature