Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Only about a third of people with asthma attend an annual review. Clinicians need to identify cost-effective ways to improve access and ensure regular review.Aim
To compare the cost-effectiveness of nurse-led telephone with face-to-face asthma reviews.Design of study
Cost-effectiveness analysis based on a 3-month randomised controlled trial.Setting
Four general practices in England.Method
Adults due an asthma review were randomised to telephone or face-to-face consultations. Trial nurses recorded proportion reviewed, duration of consultation, and abortive calls/missed appointments. Data on use of healthcare resources were extracted from GP records. Cost-effectiveness was assessed from the health service perspective; sensitivity analyses we
SUBMITTER: Pinnock H
PROVIDER: S-EPMC1463186 | biostudies-literature | 2005 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature