Imitating manual curation of text-mined facts in biomedicine.

ABSTRACT: Text-mining algorithms make mistakes in extracting facts from natural-language texts. In biomedical applications, which rely on use of text-mined data, it is critical to assess the quality (the probability that the message is correctly extracted) of individual facts--to resolve data conflicts and inconsistencies. Using a large set of almost 100,000 manually produced evaluations (most facts were independently reviewed more than once, producing independent evaluations), we implemented and tested a collection of algorithms that mimic human evaluation of facts provided by an automated information-extraction system. The performance of our best automated classifiers closely approached that of our human evaluators (ROC score close to 0.95). Our hypothesis is that, were we to use a larger number o

SUBMITTER: Rodriguez-Esteban R 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1560402 | biostudies-literature | 2006 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature