PhySIC_IST: cleaning source trees to infer more informative supertrees.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Supertree methods combine phylogenies with overlapping sets of taxa into a larger one. Topological conflicts frequently arise among source trees for methodological or biological reasons, such as long branch attraction, lateral gene transfers, gene duplication/loss or deep gene coalescence. When topological conflicts occur among source trees, liberal methods infer supertrees containing the most frequent alternative, while veto methods infer supertrees not contradicting any source tree, i.e. discard all conflicting resolutions. When the source trees host a significant number of topological conflicts or have a small taxon overlap, supertree methods of both kinds can propose poorly resolved, hence uninformative, supertrees.

Results

To overcome this problem, we propose

SUBMITTER: Scornavacca C 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2576265 | biostudies-literature | 2008 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature