Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To evaluate the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor alogliptin in drug-naïve patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.

Research design and methods

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study included 329 patients with poorly controlled diabetes randomized to once-daily treatment with 12.5 mg alogliptin (n = 133), 25 mg alogliptin (n = 131), or placebo (n = 65) for 26 weeks. Primary efficacy end point was mean change from baseline in A1C at the final visit.

Results

At week 26, mean change in A1C was significantly greater (P < 0.001) for 12.5 mg (-0.56%) and 25 mg (-0.59%) alogliptin than placebo (-0.02%). Reductions in fasting plasma glucose were also greater (P < 0.001) in alogliptin-treated patients than in those receiving placebo. Overall, incidences of adverse events (67.4-70.3%) and hypoglycemia (1.5-3.0%) were similar across treatment groups.

Conclusions

Alogliptin monotherapy was well tolerated and significantly improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, without raising the incidence of hypoglycemia.

SUBMITTER: DeFronzo RA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2584188 | biostudies-literature | 2008 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

DeFronzo Ralph A RA Fleck Penny R PR Wilson Craig A CA Mekki Qais Q

Diabetes care 20080922 12

<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor alogliptin in drug-naïve patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.<h4>Research design and methods</h4>This double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study included 329 patients with poorly controlled diabetes randomized to once-daily treatment with 12.5 mg alogliptin (n = 133), 25 mg alogliptin (n = 131), or placebo (n = 65) for 26 weeks. Primary efficacy end point was mean change from baseline in A1C at ...[more]

PMID: 18809631

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: As a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, TQ-F3083 represents a promising new drug for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This phase I, first-in-human study evaluated the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of TQ-F3083 in healthy Chinese adults. Methods: Sixty healthy participants total were enrolled in the single-ascending dose, multiple-dose, and food-effect studies. Safety endpoints included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram, abdominal ultrasound, chest X-ray, physical examination, and clinical laboratory tests. Blood, urine, and feces samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analyses. Pharmacodynamic parameters were evaluated based on DPP-4 activity and the active glucagon-like peptide-1 concentration. Results: In total, 22 treatment-related AEs, mostly grade 1 or 2, were reported in 14 individuals. No deaths, serious AEs, or grade ≥4 AEs occurred, and no dose-dependent AEs were demonstrated. For pharmacokinetic characteristics, dose linearity was analyzed using power model. The slopes (90% CIs) were 1.08 (1.02-1.13) and 1.05 (0.99-1.11) for AUC0-t and AUC0-∞, suggesting liner pharmacokinetic characteristic after oral dose TQ-F3083 from 2 to 160 mg. The accumulation factor was 1.39 after multiple dose for 7 days. Decreased plasma exposure (84.87% decrease in Cmax, 49.23% in AUC0-t, and 47.77% in AUC0-∞) was observed with administration after a high-fat and high-calorie standardized breakfast. The 0-72 h TQ-F3083 excretion recovery percentages were 7.84% in urine and 5.76% in feces. Over 80% DPP-4 inhibition for 24 h was observed in the 20-160 mg cohorts, and the model-estimated 50% effective concentration was 1.10 ng/ml. The concentration of active glucagon-like peptide-1 increased after TQ-F3083 administration, but no obvious dose dependency was observed. Conclusion: TQ-F3083 was well tolerated in healthy Chinese adults, and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics support further evaluation of TQ-F3083 in a trial in T2DM patients.

Project description:BackgroundNeutrophil serine proteases are involved in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and increased serine protease activity has been reported in severe and fatal infection. We investigated whether brensocatib, an inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-1 (DPP-1; an enzyme responsible for the activation of neutrophil serine proteases), would improve outcomes in patients hospitalised with COVID-19.MethodsIn a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial, across 14 hospitals in the UK, patients aged 16 years and older who were hospitalised with COVID-19 and had at least one risk factor for severe disease were randomly assigned 1:1, within 96 h of hospital admission, to once-daily brensocatib 25 mg or placebo orally for 28 days. Patients were randomly assigned via a central web-based randomisation system (TruST). Randomisation was stratified by site and age (65 years or ≥65 years), and within each stratum, blocks were of random sizes of two, four, or six patients. Participants in both groups continued to receive other therapies required to manage their condition. Participants, study staff, and investigators were masked to the study assignment. The primary outcome was the 7-point WHO ordinal scale for clinical status at day 29 after random assignment. The intention-to-treat population included all patients who were randomly assigned and met the enrolment criteria. The safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication. This study was registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN30564012.FindingsBetween June 5, 2020, and Jan 25, 2021, 406 patients were randomly assigned to brensocatib or placebo; 192 (47·3%) to the brensocatib group and 214 (52·7%) to the placebo group. Two participants were excluded after being randomly assigned in the brensocatib group (214 patients included in the placebo group and 190 included in the brensocatib group in the intention-to-treat population). Primary outcome data was unavailable for six patients (three in the brensocatib group and three in the placebo group). Patients in the brensocatib group had worse clinical status at day 29 after being randomly assigned than those in the placebo group (adjusted odds ratio 0·72 [95% CI 0·57-0·92]). Prespecified subgroup analyses of the primary outcome supported the primary results. 185 participants reported at least one adverse event; 99 (46%) in the placebo group and 86 (45%) in the brensocatib group. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders and infections. One death in the placebo group was judged as possibly related to study drug.InterpretationBrensocatib treatment did not improve clinical status at day 29 in patients hospitalised with COVID-19.FundingSponsored by the University of Dundee and supported through an Investigator Initiated Research award from Insmed, Bridgewater, NJ; STOP-COVID19 trial.

Project description:Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a complex and progressive disease that is showing an apparently unstoppable increase worldwide. Although there is general agreement on the first-line use of metformin in most patients with type 2 diabetes, the ideal drug sequence after metformin failure is an area of increasing uncertainty. New treatment strategies target pancreatic islet dysfunction, in particular gut-derived incretin hormones. Inhibition of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) slows degradation of endogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and thereby enhances and prolongs the action of the endogenous incretin hormones. The five available DPP-4 inhibitors, also known as 'gliptins' (sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, alogliptin), are small molecules used orally with similar overall clinical efficacy and safety profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes. The main differences between the five gliptins on the market include: potency, target selectivity, oral bioavailability, long or short half-life, high or low binding to plasma proteins, metabolism, presence of active or inactive metabolites, excretion routes, dosage adjustment for renal and liver insufficiency, and potential drug-drug interactions. On average, treatment with gliptins is expected to produce a mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) decrease of 0.5%-0.8%, with about 40% of diabetic subjects at target for the HbA1c goal <7%. There are very few studies comparing DPP-4 inhibitors. Alogliptin as monotherapy or added to metformin, pioglitazone, glibenclamide, voglibose, or insulin therapy significantly improves glycemic control compared with placebo in adult or elderly patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. In the EXAMINE trial, alogliptin is being compared with placebo on cardiovascular outcomes in approximately 5,400 patients with type 2 diabetes. In clinical studies, DPP-4 inhibitors were generally safe and well tolerated. However, there are limited data on their tolerability, due to their relatively recent marketing approval. Alogliptin will be used most when avoidance of hypoglycemic events is paramount, such as in patients with congestive heart failure, renal failure, and liver disease, and in the elderly.

Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Objective

Research design and methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets