Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Mixed-effect models are frequently used to control for the nonindependence of data points, for example, when repeated measures from the same individuals are available. The aim of these models is often to estimate fixed effects and to test their significance. This is usually done by including random intercepts, that is, intercepts that are allowed to vary between individuals. The widespread belief is that this controls for all types of pseudoreplication within individuals. Here we show that this is not the case, if the aim is to estimate effects that vary within individuals and individuals differ in their response to these effects. In these cases, random intercept models give overconfident estimates leading to conclusions that are not supported by the data. By allowing individuals to differ
SUBMITTER: Schielzeth H
PROVIDER: S-EPMC2657178 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA