Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
The purpose of this study was to determine if an orthopedic pelvic blocking procedure affects cervical spine extensor isometric strength.Methods
Twenty-two participants were sequentially assigned into treatment and control groups. Treatment consisted of a 2-minute procedure using orthopedic blocks (padded wedges with a 45 degrees incline) that were placed bilaterally under the ilia as determined by leg length assessment. Isometric strength measurements took place in 2 sessions with a day of rest between. The treatment group received therapy at the second session immediate to postisometric measures.Results
Outcome measures were the pre- and posttreatment measurements of cervical isometric extension strength in pounds. The t tests showed no statistically significant difference between groups in isometric extension strength before treatment. One-way analysis of variance demonstrated a significant difference between groups after treatment (F(1,21) = 7.174, P = .014). The treatment group demonstrated an average increase of 6.35 (8.18) lb in extensor strength.Conclusions
The current study showed a statistically significant change in cervical isometric extensor strength after sacroiliac joint blocking.
SUBMITTER: Giggey K
PROVIDER: S-EPMC2780950 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Journal of chiropractic medicine 20090601 2
<h4>Objective</h4>The purpose of this study was to determine if an orthopedic pelvic blocking procedure affects cervical spine extensor isometric strength.<h4>Methods</h4>Twenty-two participants were sequentially assigned into treatment and control groups. Treatment consisted of a 2-minute procedure using orthopedic blocks (padded wedges with a 45 degrees incline) that were placed bilaterally under the ilia as determined by leg length assessment. Isometric strength measurements took place in 2 s ...[more]