Dataset Information

Spatial normalization improves the quality of genotype calling for Affymetrix SNP 6.0 arrays.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Microarray measurements are susceptible to a variety of experimental artifacts, some of which give rise to systematic biases that are spatially dependent in a unique way on each chip. It is likely that such artifacts affect many SNP arrays, but the normalization methods used in currently available genotyping algorithms make no attempt at spatial bias correction. Here, we propose an effective single-chip spatial bias removal procedure for Affymetrix 6.0 SNP arrays or platforms with similar design features. This procedure deals with both extreme and subtle biases and is intended to be applied before standard genotype calling algorithms.

Results

Application of the spatial bias adjustments on HapMap samples resulted in higher genotype call rates with equal or even better accuracy for thousands of SNPs. Consequently the normalization procedure is expected to lead to more meaningful biological inferences and could be valuable for genome-wide SNP analysis.

Conclusions

Spatial normalization can potentially rescue thousands of SNPs in a genetic study at the small cost of computational time. The approach is implemented in R and available from the authors upon request.

SUBMITTER: Chai HS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2910027 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Spatial normalization improves the quality of genotype calling for Affymetrix SNP 6.0 arrays.

Chai High Seng HS Therneau Terry M TM Bailey Kent R KR Kocher Jean-Pierre A JP

BMC bioinformatics 20100629

<h4>Background</h4>Microarray measurements are susceptible to a variety of experimental artifacts, some of which give rise to systematic biases that are spatially dependent in a unique way on each chip. It is likely that such artifacts affect many SNP arrays, but the normalization methods used in currently available genotyping algorithms make no attempt at spatial bias correction. Here, we propose an effective single-chip spatial bias removal procedure for Affymetrix 6.0 SNP arrays or platforms ...[more]

PMID: 20587065

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCopy number data are routinely being extracted from genome-wide association study chips using a variety of software. We empirically evaluated and compared four freely-available software packages designed for Affymetrix SNP chips to estimate copy number: Affymetrix Power Tools (APT), Aroma.Affymetrix, PennCNV and CRLMM. Our evaluation used 1,418 GENOA samples that were genotyped on the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0. We compared bias and variance in the locus-level copy number data, the concordance amongst regions of copy number gains/deletions and the false-positive rate amongst deleted segments.ResultsAPT had median locus-level copy numbers closest to a value of two, whereas PennCNV and Aroma.Affymetrix had the smallest variability associated with the median copy number. Of those evaluated, only PennCNV provides copy number specific quality-control metrics and identified 136 poor CNV samples. Regions of copy number variation (CNV) were detected using the hidden Markov models provided within PennCNV and CRLMM/VanillaIce. PennCNV detected more CNVs than CRLMM/VanillaIce; the median number of CNVs detected per sample was 39 and 30, respectively. PennCNV detected most of the regions that CRLMM/VanillaIce did as well as additional CNV regions. The median concordance between PennCNV and CRLMM/VanillaIce was 47.9% for duplications and 51.5% for deletions. The estimated false-positive rate associated with deletions was similar for PennCNV and CRLMM/VanillaIce.ConclusionsIf the objective is to perform statistical tests on the locus-level copy number data, our empirical results suggest that PennCNV or Aroma.Affymetrix is optimal. If the objective is to perform statistical tests on the summarized segmented data then PennCNV would be preferred over CRLMM/VanillaIce. Specifically, PennCNV allows the analyst to estimate locus-level copy number, perform segmentation and evaluate CNV-specific quality-control metrics within a single software package. PennCNV has relatively small bias, small variability and detects more regions while maintaining a similar estimated false-positive rate as CRLMM/VanillaIce. More generally, we advocate that software developers need to provide guidance with respect to evaluating and choosing optimal settings in order to obtain optimal results for an individual dataset. Until such guidance exists, we recommend trying multiple algorithms, evaluating concordance/discordance and subsequently consider the union of regions for downstream association tests.

Project description:Background: Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays are an ideal technology for genotyping genetic variants in mass screening. However, using SNP arrays to detect rare variants [with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of <1%] is still a challenge because of noise signals and batch effects. An approach that improves the genotyping quality is needed for clinical applications. Methods: We developed a quality-control procedure for rare variants which integrates different algorithms, filters, and experiments to increase the accuracy of variant calling. Using data from the TWB 2.0 custom Axiom array, we adopted an advanced normalization adjustment to prevent false calls caused by splitting the cluster and a rare het adjustment which decreases false calls in rare variants. The concordance of allelic frequencies from array data was compared to those from sequencing datasets of Taiwanese. Finally, genotyping results were used to detect familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), thrombophilia (TH), and maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) to assess the performance in disease screening. All heterozygous calls were verified by Sanger sequencing or qPCR. The positive predictive value (PPV) of each step was estimated to evaluate the performance of our procedure. Results: We analyzed SNP array data from 43,433 individuals, which interrogated 267,247 rare variants. The advanced normalization and rare het adjustment methods adjusted genotyping calling of 168,134 variants (96.49%). We further removed 3916 probesets which were discordant in MAFs between the SNP array and sequencing data. The PPV for detecting pathogenic variants with 0.01%<MAF≤1% exceeded 99.37%. PPVs for those with an MAF of ≤0.01% improved from 95% to 100% for FH, 42.11% to 85.19% for TH, and 18.24% to 72.22% for MODY after adopting our rare variant quality-control procedure and experimental verification. Conclusion: Adopting our quality-control procedure, SNP arrays can adequately detect variants with MAF values ranging 0.01%∼0.1%. For variants with MAF values of ≤0.01%, experimental validation is needed unless sequencing data from a homogeneous population of >10,000 are available. The results demonstrated our procedure could perform correct genotype calling of rare variants. It provides a solution of pathogenic variant detection through SNP array. The approach brings tremendous promise for implementing precision medicine in medical practice.

Dataset Information

Spatial normalization improves the quality of genotype calling for Affymetrix SNP 6.0 arrays.

Background

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Spatial normalization improves the quality of genotype calling for Affymetrix SNP 6.0 arrays.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets