Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Symbiotic nitrogen (N)-fixing trees are rare in late-successional temperate forests, even though these forests are often N limited. Two hypotheses could explain this paradox. The 'phylogenetic constraints hypothesis' states that no late-successional tree taxa in temperate forests belong to clades that are predisposed to N fixation. Conversely, the 'selective constraints hypothesis' states that such taxa are present, but N-fixing symbioses would lower their fitness. Here we test the phylogenetic constraints hypothesis.

Methodology/principal findings

Using U.S. forest inventory data, we derived successional indices related to shade tolerance and stand age for N-fixing trees, non-fixing trees in the 'potentially N-fixing clade' (smallest angiosperm clade that includes all N fixers), and non-fixing trees outside this clade. We then used phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs) to test for associations between these successional indices and N fixation. Four results stand out from our analysis of U.S. trees. First, N fixers are less shade-tolerant than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Second, N fixers tend to occur in younger stands in a given geographical region than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Third, the potentially N-fixing clade contains numerous late-successional non-fixers. Fourth, although the N fixation trait is evolutionarily conserved, the successional traits are relatively labile.

Conclusions/significance

These results suggest that selective constraints, not phylogenetic constraints, explain the rarity of late-successional N-fixing trees in temperate forests. Because N-fixing trees could overcome N limitation to net primary production if they were abundant, this study helps to understand the maintenance of N limitation in temperate forests, and therefore the capacity of this biome to sequester carbon.

SUBMITTER: Menge DN 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2917374 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests.

Menge Duncan N L DN   DeNoyer Jeanne L JL   Lichstein Jeremy W JW  

PloS one 20100806 8


<h4>Background</h4>Symbiotic nitrogen (N)-fixing trees are rare in late-successional temperate forests, even though these forests are often N limited. Two hypotheses could explain this paradox. The 'phylogenetic constraints hypothesis' states that no late-successional tree taxa in temperate forests belong to clades that are predisposed to N fixation. Conversely, the 'selective constraints hypothesis' states that such taxa are present, but N-fixing symbioses would lower their fitness. Here we tes  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4505317 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6445091 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5565457 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7727367 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6761143 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5552780 | biostudies-literature