Molecular mechanisms mediating preconditioning following chronic ischemia differ from those in classical second window.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: A major difference between experimental ischemic preconditioning (IPC), induced by brief ischemic episodes, and the clinical situation is that patients generally have repetitive episodes of ischemia. We used a swine model to examine differences in genes regulated by classical second-window IPC (SWOP) [two 10-min episodes of coronary artery occlusion (CAO) followed by 24 h reperfusion] compared with repetitive CAO/reperfusion (RCO), i.e., two 10-min CAO 12 h apart, and to repetitive coronary stenosis (RCS), six episodes of 90 min coronary stenosis 12 h apart (n = 5/group). All three models reduced infarct size by 60-85%, which was mediated by nitric oxide in SWOP but not in the other two models. We employed microarray analyses to discover additional molecular pathways intrinsic to models of
SUBMITTER: Depre C
PROVIDER: S-EPMC2944496 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA