The effect of algorithms on copy number variant detection.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The detection of copy number variants (CNVs) and the results of CNV-disease association studies rely on how CNVs are defined, and because array-based technologies can only infer CNVs, CNV-calling algorithms can produce vastly different findings. Several authors have noted the large-scale variability between CNV-detection methods, as well as the substantial false positive and false negative rates associated with those methods. In this study, we use variations of four common algorithms for CNV detection (PennCNV, QuantiSNP, HMMSeg, and cnvPartition) and two definitions of overlap (any overlap and an overlap of at least 40% of the smaller CNV) to illustrate the effects of varying algorithms and definitions of overlap on CNV discovery.

Methodology and principal findings</

SUBMITTER: Tsuang DW 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3012691 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature