Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
The aim of this study was to compare the clinical impact of computerized decision support with and without electronic access to clinical guidelines and laboratory data on antibiotic prescribing decisions.Design
A crossover trial was conducted of four levels of computerized decision support-no support, antibiotic guidelines, laboratory reports, and laboratory reports plus a decision support system (DSS), randomly allocated to eight simulated clinical cases accessed by the Web.Measurements
Rate of intervention adoption was measured by frequency of accessing information support, cost of use was measured by time taken to complete each case, and effectiveness of decision was measured by correctness of and self-reported confidence in individual prescribing decis
SUBMITTER: Sintchenko V
PROVIDER: S-EPMC305460 | biostudies-literature | 2004 Jan-Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature