Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Impact of exposure measurement error in air pollution epidemiology: effect of error type in time-series studies.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Two distinctly different types of measurement error are Berkson and classical. Impacts of measurement error in epidemiologic studies of ambient air pollution are expected to depend on error type. We characterize measurement error due to instrument imprecision and spatial variability as multiplicative (i.e. additive on the log scale) and model it over a range of error types to assess impacts on risk ratio estimates both on a per measurement unit basis and on a per interquartile range (IQR) basis in a time-series study in Atlanta.

Methods

Daily measures of twelve ambient air pollutants were analyzed: NO2, NOx, O3, SO2, CO, PM10 mass, PM2.5 mass, and PM2.5 components sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, elemental carbon and organic carbon. Semivariogram analysis was applied to assess spatial variability. Error due to this spatial variability was added to a reference pollutant time-series on the log scale using Monte Carlo simulations. Each of these time-series was exponentiated and introduced to a Poisson generalized linear model of cardiovascular disease emergency department visits.

Results

Measurement error resulted in reduced statistical significance for the risk ratio estimates for all amounts (corresponding to different pollutants) and types of error. When modelled as classical-type error, risk ratios were attenuated, particularly for primary air pollutants, with average attenuation in risk ratios on a per unit of measurement basis ranging from 18% to 92% and on an IQR basis ranging from 18% to 86%. When modelled as Berkson-type error, risk ratios per unit of measurement were biased away from the null hypothesis by 2% to 31%, whereas risk ratios per IQR were attenuated (i.e. biased toward the null) by 5% to 34%. For CO modelled error amount, a range of error types were simulated and effects on risk ratio bias and significance were observed.

Conclusions

For multiplicative error, both the amount and type of measurement error impact health effect estimates in air pollution epidemiology. By modelling instrument imprecision and spatial variability as different error types, we estimate direction and magnitude of the effects of error over a range of error types.

SUBMITTER: Goldman GT 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3146396 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Impact of exposure measurement error in air pollution epidemiology: effect of error type in time-series studies.

Goldman Gretchen T GT   Mulholland James A JA   Russell Armistead G AG   Strickland Matthew J MJ   Klein Mitchel M   Waller Lance A LA   Tolbert Paige E PE  

Environmental health : a global access science source 20110622


<h4>Background</h4>Two distinctly different types of measurement error are Berkson and classical. Impacts of measurement error in epidemiologic studies of ambient air pollution are expected to depend on error type. We characterize measurement error due to instrument imprecision and spatial variability as multiplicative (i.e. additive on the log scale) and model it over a range of error types to assess impacts on risk ratio estimates both on a per measurement unit basis and on a per interquartile  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5378630 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3025780 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3139251 | biostudies-literature