Dataset Information

Revising expectations from rapid HIV tests in the emergency department.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Expanded HIV screening efforts in the United States have increased the use of rapid HIV tests in emergency departments. The reported sensitivity and specificity of rapid HIV tests exceed 99%.

Objective

To assess whether a reactive rapid oral HIV test result correctly identifies adults with HIV infection in the emergency department.

Design

Diagnostic test performance assessment within the framework of a randomized, clinical trial.

Setting

Brigham and Women's Hospital emergency department (Boston, Massachusetts) from 7 February to 1 October 2007.

Patients

849 adults with valid rapid oral HIV test results.

Intervention

Rapid HIV testing with the OraQuick ADVANCE Rapid HIV-1/2 Antibody Test (OraSure Technologies, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania). Patients with reactive rapid test results were offered enzyme-linked immunoassay, Western blot, and plasma HIV-1 RNA testing for confirmation.

Measurements

Specificity and positive likelihood ratio.

Results

39 patients had reactive results (4.6% [95% CI, 3.2% to 6.0%]). On confirmation, 5 patients were HIV-infected (prevalence, 0.6% [CI, 0.1% to 1.1%]) and 26 were non-HIV-infected (8 patients declined confirmation). The estimated rapid test specificity was 96.9% (CI, 95.7% to 98.1%). Sensitivity analyses of the true HIV status of unconfirmed cases and test sensitivity resulted in a positive likelihood ratio of 8 to 32. Western blot alone as a confirmation test provided conclusive HIV status in only 50.0% (CI, 30.8% to 69.2%) of patients at first follow-up. The addition of HIV-1 RNA testing to the confirmation protocol improved this rate to 96.2% (CI, 88.8% to 100.0%).

Limitation

Test sensitivity cannot be assessed because nonreactive OraQuick test results were not confirmed.

Conclusion

Although patients with a reactive oral OraQuick HIV screening test in the emergency department had an 8- to 32-fold increased odds of HIV infection compared with the pretest odds, the specificity of the test was lower than anticipated.

SUBMITTER: Walensky RP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3260470 | biostudies-literature | 2008 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Revising expectations from rapid HIV tests in the emergency department.

Walensky Rochelle P RP Arbelaez Christian C Reichmann William M WM Walls Ron M RM Katz Jeffrey N JN Block Brian L BL Dooley Matthew M Hetland Adam A Kimmel Simeon S Solomon Jessica D JD Losina Elena E

Annals of internal medicine 20080801 3

<h4>Background</h4>Expanded HIV screening efforts in the United States have increased the use of rapid HIV tests in emergency departments. The reported sensitivity and specificity of rapid HIV tests exceed 99%.<h4>Objective</h4>To assess whether a reactive rapid oral HIV test result correctly identifies adults with HIV infection in the emergency department.<h4>Design</h4>Diagnostic test performance assessment within the framework of a randomized, clinical trial.<h4>Setting</h4>Brigham and Women' ...[more]

PMID: 18678842

Similar Datasets

Project description:In India, and many low-middle income countries (LMICs), emergency medicine (EM) remains a poorly defined specialty and an unregulated field of clinical practice. Recognition of the attitudes, understanding, and expectations of patients presenting to Indian EDs will be crucial to the continued development of EM as a specialty. This is a multicenter, prospective, cross sectional study of adult and pediatric patients presenting to the ED in three geographically distinct regions of India. Participants were surveyed about their expectations regarding the type of care that they expected to receive, previous treatment options they have utilized, basic understanding of ED operations, factors contributing to their decision to seek ED care, and basic demographic information. 779 patients were approached to participate in the study, of which 698 (90%) completed the survey. Common ways that patients reported learning about the ED were referral from another healthcare provider (45%) and recommendation by a family member (61%). Participants chose the ED was because they thought they would be seen quickly (89%), would receive acute pain management (45%), their regular outpatient care was closed (45%), or were sent by another doctor (45%). Patients expected to wait 0.3 hours (18 minutes) on average to see a doctor in the ED. Over 75% or patients expected to see a specialist consultant in the ED and 12% expected to see their personal physician. Eighty-five percent of patients were triaged as moderate or high acuity, and 74% of patients were admitted. This study found that ED in India is utilized by a population with an extremely high acuity of medical illness that attempts to access healthcare through multiple avenues. Patients most frequently visit the ED due to a referral from another healthcare provider or family member. Most patients are aware of the existence of the ED, though understanding of available services may be lacking. Future research should focus on community outreach and education initiatives on ED services.

Project description:Abstract Objectives Recent research has helped define the complex pathways in sepsis, affording new opportunities for advancing diagnostics tests. Given significant advances in the field, a group of academic investigators from emergency medicine, intensive care, pathology, and pharmacology assembled to develop consensus around key gaps and potential future use for emerging rapid host response diagnostics assays in the emergency department (ED) setting. Methods A modified Delphi study was conducted that included 26 panelists (expert consensus panel) from multiple specialties. A smaller steering committee first defined a list of Delphi statements related to the need for and future potential use of a hypothetical sepsis diagnostic test in the ED. Likert scoring was used to assess panelists agreement or disagreement with statements. Two successive rounds of surveys were conducted and consensus for statements was operationally defined as achieving agreement or disagreement of 75% or greater. Results Significant gaps were identified related to current tools for assessing risk of sepsis in the ED. Strong consensus indicated the need for a test providing an indication of the severity of dysregulated host immune response, which would be helpful even if it did not identify the specific pathogen. Although there was a relatively high degree of uncertainty regarding which patients would most benefit from the test, the panel agreed that an ideal host response sepsis test should aim to be integrated into ED triage and thus should produce results in less than 30 minutes. The panel also agreed that such a test would be most valuable for improving sepsis outcomes and reducing rates of unnecessary antibiotic use. Conclusion The expert consensus panel expressed strong consensus regarding gaps in sepsis diagnostics in the ED and the potential for new rapid host response tests to help fill these gaps. These finding provide a baseline framework for assessing key attributes of evolving host response diagnostic tests for sepsis in the ED.

Project description:The Toronto Western Hospital is an academic hospital in Toronto, Canada, with an annual Emergency Department (ED) volume of 64,000 patients. Despite increases in patient volumes of almost six percent per annum over the last decade, there have been no commensurate increases in resources, infrastructure, and staffing. This has led to substantial increase in patient wait times, most specifically for those patients with lower acuity presentations. Despite requiring only minimal care, these patients contribute disproportionately to ED congestion, which can adversely impact resource utilization and quality of care for all patients. We undertook a retrospective evaluation of a quality improvement initiative aimed at improving wait times experienced by patients with lower acuity presentations. A rapid improvement event was organized by frontline workers to rapidly overhaul processes of care, leading to the creation of the Rapid Medical Evaluation (RME) unit - a new pathway of care for patients with lower acuity presentations. The RME unit was designed by re-purposing existing resources and re-assigning one physician and one nurse towards the specific care of these patients. We evaluated the performance of the RME unit through measurement of physician initial assessment (PIA) times and total length of stay (LOS) times for multiple groups of patients assigned to various ED care pathways, during three periods lasting three months each. Weekly measurements of mean and 90th percentile of PIA and LOS times showed special cause variation in all targeted patient groups. Of note, the patients seen in the RME unit saw their median PIA and LOS times decrease from 98min to 70min and from 165min to 130min, respectively, from baseline. Despite ever-growing numbers of patient visits, wait times for all patients with lower acuity presentations remained low, and wait times of patients with higher acuity presentations assigned to other ED care pathways were not adversely affected. By specifically re-purposing a fraction of existing staff, resources, and infrastructure for patients with lower acuity presentations, we were able to streamline their care and decrease wait times in the ED. These results were achieved through the incremental improvements afforded by rapidly cycling through PDSA cycles, with strong frontline staff involvement and continuously eliciting feedback for improvement. We believe the model to be replicable in other academic medical centres.

Dataset Information

Revising expectations from rapid HIV tests in the emergency department.

Background

Objective

Design

Setting

Patients

Intervention

Measurements

Results

Limitation

Conclusion

Publications

Revising expectations from rapid HIV tests in the emergency department.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets