Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Rationale
Non-daily, or intermittent smokers (ITS), are increasingly prevalent. Their smoking may be more situational than that of daily smokers (DS), and thus is hypothesized to be more influenced by cues.Objectives
To assess ITS' response to cues, and compare it to that of DS.Methods
Samples of 239 ITS and 207 DS (previously reported in Shiffman et al. 2012a) were studied in 2,586 laboratory cue-reactivity sessions. Craving (Questionnaire of Smoking Urges) and smoking (probability, latency, puff parameters, and carbon monoxide increases) in response to cues was assessed following exposure to neutral cues and cues related to smoking, alcohol, negative affect, positive affect, and smoking prohibitions. Mixed effects models, generalized estimating equations and rando
SUBMITTER: Shiffman S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3581749 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature