Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Little is known about the clinical features, procedural risks, or survival of patients receiving replacement versus new implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).Methods and results
Entries in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) ICD Registry from 2005 through 2010 were eligible for inclusion (n=463,978). Baseline demographic data, clinical information, and procedural variables were compared between patients receiving new (n=359,993; 77.6%) and replacement (n=103,985; 22.4%) ICDs and entered into a propensity match model to determine adjusted survival rates. Patients receiving replacement ICDs were older (70.7 versus 67.5 years of age) and more likely to have atrial fibrillation (41.8% versus 31.4%; P<0.001) and ventricular tachycardia (60.5% ver
SUBMITTER: Kramer DB
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3839636 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature