A systematic review of cancer GWAS and candidate gene meta-analyses reveals limited overlap but similar effect sizes.

ABSTRACT: Candidate gene and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) represent two complementary approaches to uncovering genetic contributions to common diseases. We systematically reviewed the contributions of these approaches to our knowledge of genetic associations with cancer risk by analyzing the data in the Cancer Genome-wide Association and Meta Analyses database (Cancer GAMAdb). The database catalogs studies published since January 1, 2000, by study and cancer type. In all, we found that meta-analyses and pooled analyses of candidate genes reported 349 statistically significant associations and GWAS reported 269, for a total of 577 unique associations. Only 41 (7.1%) associations were reported in both candidate gene meta-analyses and GWAS, usually with similar effect sizes. When considering

SUBMITTER: Chang CQ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3925284 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature