Efficacy of peer-led interventions to reduce unprotected anal intercourse among men who have sex with men: a meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of peer-led interventions in reducing unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) among men who have sex with men (MSM).

Methods

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental studies, pre- and post-intervention studies without control groups, and serial cross-sectional assessments involving peers delivering interventions among MSM and published as of February 2012 were identified by systematically searching 13 electronic databases and cross-referencing. Effect sizes (ES) were calculated as the changes of standardized mean difference (SMD) in UAI between groups or pre-post intervention.

Results

A total of 22 studies met the eligibility criteria, including five RCTs, six quasi-experimenta

SUBMITTER: Ye S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3948720 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature