Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
We performed a retrospective study to assess whether the initial molecular characteristics of glioblastomas (GBMs) were associated with the response to the bevacizumab/irinotecan chemotherapy regimen given at recurrence.Results
Comparison of the genomic and gene expression profiles of the responders (n = 12) and nonresponders (n = 13) demonstrated only slight differences and could not identify any robust biomarkers associated with the response. In contrast, a significant association was observed between GBMs molecular subtypes and response rates. GBMs assigned to molecular subtype IGS-18 and to classical subtype had a lower response rate than those assigned to other subtypes. In an independent series of 33 patients, neither EGFR amplification nor CDKN2A deletion (which are frequent in IGS-18 and classical GBMs) was significantly associated with the response rate, suggesting that these two alterations are unlikely to explain the lower response rate of these GBMs molecular subtypes.Conclusion
Despite its limited sample size, the present study suggests that comparing the initial molecular profiles of responders and nonresponders might not be an effective strategy to identify biomarkers of the response to bevacizumab given at recurrence. Yet it suggests that the response rate might differ among GBMs molecular subtypes.
SUBMITTER: Laffaire J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3996912 | biostudies-literature | 2014
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Laffaire Julien J Di Stefano Anna Luisa AL Chinot Olivier O Idbaih Ahmed A Gallego Perez-Larraya Jaime J Marie Yannick Y Vintonenko Nadia N Boisselier Blandine B Farina Patrizia P Delattre Jean-Yves JY Figarella-Branger Dominique D Honnorat Jérôme J Sanson Marc M Ducray François F
BioMed research international 20140402
<h4>Background</h4>We performed a retrospective study to assess whether the initial molecular characteristics of glioblastomas (GBMs) were associated with the response to the bevacizumab/irinotecan chemotherapy regimen given at recurrence.<h4>Results</h4>Comparison of the genomic and gene expression profiles of the responders (n = 12) and nonresponders (n = 13) demonstrated only slight differences and could not identify any robust biomarkers associated with the response. In contrast, a significa ...[more]