Dataset Information

Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the primary prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Study assists the view that a fasting plasma glucose level ≥100 mg/dL increases cardiovascular risk.

ABSTRACT:

Unlabelled

Aims/Introduction: To evaluate the relationship between fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level and cardiovascular disease in patients with hypercholesterolemia, and to evaluate the effect of pravastatin on risk reduction in a post-hoc analysis of the large-scale Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the primary prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Study.

Materials and methods

A total of 7832 patients were randomized to diet alone or diet plus low-dose pravastatin (10-20 mg/day, average 8.3 mg during follow-up periods) and followed for >5 years. In this analysis, the relationship between FPG and risk of cardiovascular disease events over 5 years were studied in 6673 patients with recorded baseline FPG levels by using the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model with the restricted quadratic spline based on three knots for FPG quartiles.

Results

The spline curve showed an obvious sharp increased risk from a FPG of ≥100 mg/dL. The spline curve in the diet plus pravastatin group was consistently lower than in the diet group, regardless of the FPG level.

Conclusions

The risk of cardiovascular disease appears to increase when FPG is ≥100 mg/dL, with a sharp increased risk found above this level in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Statin treatment seems to be beneficial to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in this population. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (no. NCT00211705). (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2011.00121.x, 2011).

SUBMITTER: Tajima N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4019309 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the primary prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Study assists the view that a fasting plasma glucose level ≥100 mg/dL increases cardiovascular risk.

Tajima Naoko N Kurata Hideaki H Ohashi Yasuo Y Mizuno Kyoichi K Nakamura Haruo H

Journal of diabetes investigation 20111001 5

<h4>Unlabelled</h4>Aims/Introduction: To evaluate the relationship between fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level and cardiovascular disease in patients with hypercholesterolemia, and to evaluate the effect of pravastatin on risk reduction in a post-hoc analysis of the large-scale Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the primary prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Study.<h4>Materials and methods</h4> A total of 7832 patients were randomized to diet alone or diet plus low-dose pravastatin (1 ...[more]

PMID: 24843520

Similar Datasets

Project description:UnlabelledThe MOVEST study evaluated the efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate versus licensed monthly IV ibandronate in Japanese osteoporotic patients. Relative BMD gains after 12 months were 5.22 % oral and 5.34 % IV, showing non-inferiority of oral to IV ibandronate (primary endpoint). No new safety concerns were identified.IntroductionThe randomized, phase 3, double-blind MOVEST (Monthly Oral VErsus intravenouS ibandronaTe) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate versus the licensed monthly intravenous (IV) ibandronate regimen in Japanese patients with osteoporosis.MethodsAmbulatory patients aged ≥ 55 years with primary osteoporosis were randomized to receive oral ibandronate 100 mg/month plus monthly IV placebo, or IV ibandronate 1 mg/month plus monthly oral placebo. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of oral versus IV ibandronate with respect to bone mineral density (BMD) gains at the lumbar spine after 12 months of treatment.ResultsFour hundred twenty-two patients were enrolled with 372 patients in the per-protocol set (183 and 189 in the oral and IV ibandronate groups, respectively). The relative change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD values for the oral and IV ibandronate groups, respectively, was 5.22 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 4.65, 5.80) and 5.34 % (95 % CI 4.78, 5.90). The least squares mean difference between the two groups was -0.23 % (95 % CI -0.97, 0.51), showing non-inferiority of oral ibandronate to IV ibandronate (non-inferiority limit = -1.60). Changes in BMD values at other sites, and bone turnover marker levels in the oral ibandronate group, were comparable with those of the IV group. The safety profile was similar to that previously demonstrated; no new safety concerns were identified.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated the non-inferiority of oral ibandronate 100 mg/month to IV ibandronate 1 mg/month (licensed dose in Japan) in increasing lumbar spine BMD in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis.

Project description:BackgroundThe risk of stroke in individuals with very low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations remains high. We sought to prioritize predictive risk factors for stroke in Chinese participants with LDL-C concentrations < 70 mg/dL using a survival conditional inference tree, a machine learning method.MethodsThe training dataset included 9327 individuals with LDL-C concentrations < 70 mg/dL who were free of cardiovascular diseases and did not use lipid-modifying drugs from the Kailuan I study (N = 101,510). We examined the validity of this algorithm in a second Chinese cohort of 1753 participants with LDL-C concentrations < 70 mg/dL from the Kailuan II study (N = 35,856).ResultsDuring a mean 8.5-9.0-year follow-up period, we identified 388 ischemic stroke cases and 145 hemorrhagic stroke cases in the training dataset and 20 ischemic stroke cases and 8 hemorrhagic stroke cases in the validation dataset. Of 15 examined predictors, poorly controlled blood pressure and very low LDL-C concentrations (≤ 40 mg/dL) were the top hierarchical predictors of both ischemic stroke risk and hemorrhagic stroke risk. The groups, characterized by the presence of 2-3 of aforementioned risk factors, were associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio (HR) 7.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.01-9.85 in the training dataset; HR 4.68, 95%CI 1.58-13.9 in the validation dataset) and hemorrhagic stroke (HR 3.94, 95%CI 2.54-6.11 in the training dataset; HR 4.73, 95%CI 0.81-27.6 in the validation dataset), relative to the lowest risk groups (presence of 0-1 of these factors). There was a linear association between cumulative average LDL-C concentrations and stroke risk. LDL-C concentrations ≤ 40 mg/dL was significantly associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke (HR 2.07, 95%CI 1.53, 2.80) and hemorrhagic stroke (HR 2.70, 95%CI 1.70, 4.30) compared to LDL-C concentrations of 55-70 mg/dL, after adjustment for age, hypertension status, and other covariates.ConclusionIndividuals with extremely low LDL-C concentrations without previous lipid-modifying treatment could still be at high stroke risk.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Register, ChiCTR-TNRC-11001489 . Registered on 24-08-2011.

Project description:BackgroundThe log linear association between on-treatment LDL-C levels and ASCVD events is amplified in higher risk patient subgroups of statin versus placebo trials.ObjectivesUpdate previous systematic review to evaluate how the log linear association influences the magnitude of cardiovascular risk reduction from intensifying LDL-C lowering therapy.MethodsMEDLINE/PubMED, Clinical trials.gov, and author files were searched from 1/1/2005 through 10/30/2019 for subgroup analyses of cardiovascular outcomes trials of moderate versus high intensity statin, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 mAbs with an ASCVD endpoint (nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, cardiovascular death). Annualized ASCVD event rates were used to extrapolate 5-year ASCVD risk for each treatment group reported in subgroup analyses, which were grouped into a priori risk groups according to annualized placebo/control rates of ≥4%, 3-3.9%, or <3% ASCVD risk. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Weighted least-squares regression was used to fit linear and log-linear models.ResultsSystematic review identified 96 treatment subgroups from 2 trials of moderate versus high intensity statin, 2 trials of a PCSK9 mAb versus placebo, and 1 trial of ezetimibe versus placebo. A log linear association between on-treatment LDL-C and ASCVD risk represents the association between on-treatment LDL-C levels and ASCVD event rates, especially in higher risk subgroups. Greater relative and absolute cardiovascular risk reductions from LDL-C lowering were observed when baseline LDL-C was >100 mg/dl and in extremely high risk ASCVD patient groups.ConclusionsGreater cardiovascular and mortality risk reduction benefits from intensifying LDL-C lowering therapy may be expected in those with LDL-C ≥100 mg/dl, or in extremely high risk patient groups. When baseline LDL-C <100 mg/dl, the log linear association between LDL-C and event rates suggests that treatment options other than further LDL-C lowering should also be considered for optimal risk reduction.

Project description:BackgroundPrevious studies revealed a linear relationship between body mass index (BMI) and repeat coronary revascularization rate in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, this relationship has not been demonstrated in Korean patients who meet old and new target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of Korean dyslipidemia guidelines. Therefore, we conducted this study to find out the effect of BMI on repeat coronary revascularization rate in patients with LDL-C <55 mg/dL and patients with LDL-C <70 mg/dL.MethodsThis cohort study was followed for 42 months in Daegu Catholic Medical Center, Korea. We included 429 patients with LDL-C <70 mg/dL 1 year after PCI. We compared repeat revascularization rates using Kaplan-Meier survival curves between the normal weight group (18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 23 kg/m2) and the pre-obesity and obesity group (23 kg/m2 ≤ BMI) in patients with LDL-C <55 mg/dL and patients with LDL-C <70 mg/dL.ResultsDuring a follow-up period, there was no significant difference in repeat coronary revascularization-free survival between a group with LDL-C <55 mg/dL and a group with LDL-C <70 mg/dL (79.6% vs. 76.2%, P=0.32). In normal weight patients, LDL-C <55 mg/dL group showed higher repeat coronary revascularization-free survival than LDL-C <70 mg/dL group (89.3% vs. 77.1%, P=0.05). There was no significant difference in repeat revascularization-free survival between the normal weight group and the pre-obesity and obesity group in patients with LDL-C <70 mg/dL (77.1% vs. 75.7%, P=0.67). However, the normal weight group showed significantly higher repeat revascularization-free survival compared to the pre-obesity and obesity group in patients with LDL-C <55 mg/dL (89.3% vs. 74.3%, P=0.03). Normal body weight and LDL-C <55 mg/dL [hazard ratio (HR): 0.421, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.193-0.916, P=0.02] was the only independent predictor for repeat revascularization.ConclusionsIn Korean PCI patients with normal body weight whose LDL-C level is less than 70 mg/dL, but more than 55 mg/dL, should be treated with more intensive therapy to lower LDL-C to less than 55 mg/dL. For obese patients who have succeeded in reducing LDL-C below 55 mg/dL, it seems that weight loss should be attempted to a normal body weight level.

Project description:BackgroundPatients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥190 mg/dL are at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. Treatment guidelines recommend intensive treatment in these patients. Variation in the use of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in these patients in a national sample of cardiology practices is not known.Methods and resultsUsing data from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry-Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence registry, we assessed the proportion of patients with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL (n=49 447) receiving statin, high-intensity statin, LLT associated with ≥50% LDL-C lowering, ezetimibe, or a PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibitor between January 2013 and December 2016. We assessed practice-level rates and variation in LLT use using median rate ratio (MRR) adjusted for patient and practice characteristics. MRRs represent the likelihood that 2 random practices would differ in treatment of identical patients with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL. The proportion of patients receiving a statin, high-intensity statin, LLT associated with ≥50% LDL-C reduction, ezetimibe, or PCSK9 inhibitor were 58.5%, 31.9%, 34.6%, 8.5%, and 1.5%, respectively. Median practice-level rates and adjusted MRR for statin (56% [interquartile range, 47.3%-64.8%]; MRR, 1.20 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.23]), high-intensity statin (30.2% [interquartile range, 12.1%-41.1%]; MRR, 2.31 [95% CI, 2.12-2.51]), LLT with ≥50% LDL-C lowering (31.8% [interquartile range, 15.3%-45.5%]; MRR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.95-2.28]), ezetimibe (5.8% [interquartile range, 2.8%-9.8%]; MRR, 2.42 [95% CI, 2.21-2.63]), and PCSK9 inhibitors (0.16% [interquartile range, 0%-1.9%]; MRR, 2.38 [95% CI, 2.04-2.72]) indicated significant gaps and >200% variation in receipt of several of these medications for patients across practices. Among those without concomitant atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, even larger treatment gaps were noted (proportion of patients on a statin, high-intensity statin, LLT with ≥50% LDL-C reduction, ezetimibe, or PCSK9 inhibitor were 50.8%, 25.25%, 26.8%, 4.9%, and 0.74%, respectively).ConclusionsEvidence-based LLT use remains low among patients with elevated LDL-C with significant variation in care. System-level interventions are needed to address these gaps and reduce variation in care of these high-risk patients.

Dataset Information

Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the primary prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Study assists the view that a fasting plasma glucose level ≥100 mg/dL increases cardiovascular risk.

Unlabelled

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the primary prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Study assists the view that a fasting plasma glucose level ≥100 mg/dL increases cardiovascular risk.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets